Monday, July 17, 2006

Open Thoughts:

So, I've had a bunch of different ideas floating around in my head for the last few days/weeks and I figure that it is about time that I get them down in written form, and what better forum than my blog. So, in no particular order:

  1. If Hank Langknect is right then the basis of faith is not the Bible, it is the experience of the love of God as revealed in Word and sacrament and testified to by the community of faith.
    1. The Bible then is to be valued, not because it is infallible, but because it is a written record of how our ancestors in the faith experienced the faithfulness and love of God
  2. The way to meaningful evangelism is through "spiritual friendships."
    1. Conversions by the four spiritual laws might produce a one time high, but the high soon wears off and the new believer is left without much direction
    2. Believers would do well to leave their "holy huddles" and make friends in secular society.
    3. It is the Spirit who does the converting, not us.
    4. We are called to live IN the world.
  3. Instead of thinking of faith as a building, on a foundation. It might be better to think of faith as a spiderweb.
    1. The main parts of the web are anchored onto things which last
    2. There is an understanding that even things which we expect to last will some times fade away. Instead of an entire building falling because the foundation has a crack, a web could be easily fixed by anchoring to something new.
  4. Jesus spoke often about ordinary people being "entrusted" with the kingdom of God. We are all given the ministry of reconciliation, not only announcing that we have been reconciled to God through Christ Jesus, but also that we are to be reconciled to one another.
There you have it, the things which have been swirling around in my mind and may eventually make it out into some sort of theologically sound, well reasoned form. Until then, what you see is what you get.

1 comment:

Kate Davidson said...

David,
I was poking around the ELCA website (procrastinating writing a sermon of course) when I stumbled across this description of how Lutherans understand the Bible.

"To borrow a phrase from Luther, the Bible is "the manger in which the Word of God is laid." While Lutherans recognize differences in the way the Bible should be studied and interpreted, it is accepted as the primary and authoritative witness to the church's faith. Written and transcribed by many authors over a period of many centuries, the Bible bears remarkable testimony to the mighty acts of God in the lives of people and nations. In the Old Testament is found the vivid account of God's covenant relationship to Israel. In the New Testament is found the story of God's new covenant with all of creation in Jesus.

The New Testament is the first-hand proclamation of those who lived through the events of Jesus' life, death, and Resurrection. As such, it is the authority for Christian faith and practice. The Bible is thus not a definitive record of history or science. Rather, it is the record of the drama of God's saving care for creation throughout the course of history."

I thought, immediately, about your post regarding your's and Hank's thoughts on faith and the Bible. I believe that I agree with it... but it is an interesting way of looking at it. Much different from the way most people in our congregations do.

Kate